Will the car be what I was promised? Will the transfer finish? If something goes wrong, who will take responsibility?
Those questions are part of what a customer is paying us to answer. Selling the car is one event. Making ownership dependable is the larger business.
In 1960, Harvard professor Theodore Levitt asked a question that many companies still need to answer: What business are you actually in?
His example was the American railroads. They had been giants, then declined. People assumed demand for transportation had fallen. It had not. Cars, trucks, and planes carried that demand instead. The railroads missed the change because, in Levitt's words, "they assumed themselves to be in the railroad business rather than in the transportation business. They were product oriented instead of customer oriented." They defended the thing they sold and lost sight of the need it served.
Mobility companies in India can make the same mistake with cars. We can focus on listing cars better, pricing them better, inspecting them better, financing them faster, and moving more units. Those things matter. But they do not describe the whole job. The car is what the customer sees. Confidence in owning it is what the customer needs.
I do not mean trust as a brand value. I mean confidence in the car, the paperwork, the financing, the transfer, and the help available if something breaks. A transaction happens once. Ownership continues after it. In India, that can mean discovering a challan months later, getting a PUC check, fixing a FASTag that will not recharge, or waiting for an RC to leave someone else's name. People are not only buying a machine. They are buying the hope that owning it will not keep surprising them in ways they cannot manage.
A car is made of thousands of parts that age at different rates. From the outside, a buyer cannot see all of that history. The previous owner may be a stranger. A new car offers one kind of reassurance because it has not yet passed through several owners and repair histories. The used-car opportunity is to make more of that history visible and ownership easier to manage, without making a new car.
That is one way to understand a premium experience in used-car retail. It does not have to mean a fancier showroom. It can mean fewer unanswered questions. A problem that is found, explained, and assigned to someone is easier to deal with than a mystery the customer discovers alone. We are still working toward that kind of experience. It takes systems that connect the details with people who follow through.
The cost of what you cannot see
The used-car category has always had an information problem. Buyers may not know enough. Sellers may not be able to prove enough. Intermediaries often know more than either side. Documents can be messy, vehicle histories incomplete, and condition uneven. So the price is not just payment for the car. It also reflects a guess about what the buyer cannot see.
That uncertainty is one reason inspection, verification, warranties, and return policies matter. They offer reassurance, but each covers only part of the experience. Buyers need to know the vehicle is what it claims to be, that the paperwork and transfer can be completed, that financing reflects the asset fairly, and that ownership will be manageable. If something goes wrong, they need to know where to turn. Solving one part can make a useful feature. Connecting the parts can make the whole experience more dependable.
Consider the same car with a cleaner transfer, a clearer history, and fair financing. The metal has not changed. But the buyer may have more confidence in its price, its resale value, and the decision to buy it. The experience around the car changes how people see the car itself.
The proof is in the parts beyond the sale
Transfer is often treated as administrative work. It is also one of the moments when a buyer or seller finds out whether the system can be trusted. If a previous owner remains legally exposed after a sale, the whole market has reason to feel uneasy. That worry can affect prices, resale, and whether people see used cars as a sound choice.
In 2022, the government created an authorized-dealer framework and a procedure for registered dealers to report vehicle delivery to authorities. This gives those dealers a formal way to notify the system. Buyers and sellers still need a clear process to complete the registration transfer and understand when it is recorded. Public systems help determine what ownership means, so they are part of the customer experience too. The government announcement explains the framework.
Financing shows the same connection. The IndianBlueBook FY25 report puts used-car financing at roughly one quarter of purchases, compared with about three quarters for new cars. A lender needs enough information to judge an asset. Clearer history, sound inspection, and reliable title and transfer processes can help make that possible. The same details that reassure a buyer can also help a lender assess a car. Over time, good records may help more cars become financeable, insurable, and easier to resell.
There is another part of ownership that a business cannot ignore: what happens when a car is involved in a crash or a compensation claim stalls. A company that helps people buy cars cannot make every later problem disappear. But it can take seriously the consequences of putting more people into cars and think about the support and recourse people may need afterward. Safety and help after a sale belong in a complete conversation about ownership.
Why Indian auto is still early
Once we see confidence as part of the product, the size of the opportunity looks different. India is not early in demand. CRISIL's July 2025 release estimated the used-car market at about ₹4 lakh crore and forecast more than six million units for FY2025-26. MoRTH registration data for 2022 put ownership at roughly 35 cars per 1,000 people. IndianBlueBook's FY25 report put the organized share of used-car sales at about a third. The figures point to a large market where many parts of ownership remain fragmented.
Information is uneven. Transfer can still be manual. Financing may reflect uncertainty as much as the car or the buyer. In more developed markets, many systems around buying and owning a car feel routine. In India, parts of that system are still being built.
That is the opportunity. Larger businesses may come from making ownership work more reliably, not simply from listing more cars or moving them faster. The work includes clearer information, cleaner transfer, more understandable pricing, reliable support, and a stronger way to handle problems. As these parts improve, more people may find ownership within reach and resale easier to trust.
I see this as the same question behind several other essays about cars. The market can grow when ownership becomes easier to enter and live with. Lending can widen access when the asset can be understood. An existing car may be a greener choice, but only when its history and condition can be assessed. Road safety is part of the experience people have after they buy. These are connected questions about the systems around a car.
The same idea applies inside a company. We cannot make promises about certainty to customers if information and problems get stuck inside our own systems. A company that wants to earn trust outside has to make it possible for people inside to see what is happening, share what they know, and respond when reality changes.
What business we are in
When people ask what Cars24 is, saying only that we sell used cars misses part of the job. The car is the thing that changes hands. We also need to help people understand what they are buying, complete the paperwork, access fair financing, and find support when ownership brings a problem.
Levitt's railroads had customers, tracks, and trains. But they held on to their definition of the business while transportation changed around them. The need in Indian mobility is not simply to put more cars on the road. It is to make owning one a more understandable and manageable choice. The better we do that, the more useful the market can become for everyone involved.
Notes and Sources
- Theodore Levitt, "Marketing Myopia," Harvard Business Review, July-August 1960. The railroads-versus-transportation argument, quoted verbatim.
- CRISIL Ratings, July 2025. Used-car market size, volume, and the used-to-new ratio.
- MoRTH registration data via Data For India. Roughly 35 cars per 1,000 people.
- IndianBlueBook, FY25. Organized share of used-car sales and financing penetration.
- Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 2022 "deemed ownership" amendment.